The worlds smallest Slony cluster?

We recently updated on of our Slony clusters. I think it at least used to qualify as one of the worlds smallest ones:

  • Two nodes (obvious minimum)
  • one database (that's a given)
  • with one table
  • with one column
  • with one row

Now, we recently doubled the size of this cluster. It now has a whopping two columns in the table. The second column being updated by a trigger, so it's still only one column updated by the end user (well, application). But it's two columns to be replicated!

So what does this prove? Really, not much, but at least: * Slony certainly scales "downward" just fine. It feels like a bit overhead to set it up for something like this, but it works just fine. * Even in a small database, triggers can be very useful - regardless of what the documentation of a certain other database used to say before... * And even in a trivial case like this, statement based replication simply does not work reliably. You need something that's data based - something that the same other database is actually recognizing now and will be including the next version...


Add comment

New comments can no longer be posted on this entry.

Conferences

I speak at and organize conferences around Open Source in general and PostgreSQL in particular.

Upcoming

PGConf.NYC 2022
Sep 22-23, 2022
New York, USA
PGConf.EU 2022
Oct 25-28, 2022
Berlin, Germany

Past

Swiss PGDay 2022
Jul 1, 2022
Rapperswil, Switzerland
pgCon 2022
May 24-27, 2022
Online, Online
PGConf.DE 2022
May 13, 2022
Leipzig, Germany
pgday.Paris 2022
Mar 24, 2022
Paris, France
Nordic PGDay 2022
Mar 22, 2022
Helsinki, Finland
More past conferences