Magnus Hagander's PostgreSQL blog

Entries from Monday, November 17. 2008

Monday, November 17. 2008

Recovering blog data Posted by Magnus Hagander in PostgreSQL at 15:53

Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
2031 hits
Defined tags for this entry:

Recovering blog data

Per indications from Devrim, I have given up on getting my blog entries back from the old planet machine. If they do show up, that would be a happy surprise, but I now consider it a very remote chance that it will.

Instead, I have now recovered some of my blog posts using things like google cache, the wayback machine and such methods. I will be cleaning up the old posts and turning them visible one by one over the next couple of days... If you happen to have some of my older posts saved away somewhere, please let me know :-) And if you spot formatting errors in something you find, then let me know that as well.

Finally, if you're coming to this post from a redirect. Sorry, all the old URLs are "gone", and I don't know how to get a redirect for them. Please use the archive to browse to the post you were looking for.

Update: A bit quicker than I thought, my script did a fairly good job. I've turned everything I managed to recover visible by now...

Monday, November 17. 2008

PostgreSQL Europe website finally up Posted by Magnus Hagander in PostgreSQL at 13:55

Comments (0)
Trackbacks (0)
4185 hits
Defined tags for this entry:

PostgreSQL Europe website finally up

The website for PostgreSQL Europe is finally up!

It's long overdue - we really should've had this up before the summer. But better late than never.

And please - your contributions towards it are much appreciated! Right now it's all static content handled through a django template framework, and adding such content is as simple as adding a static HTML file. So if you're interested in contributing content, please look it over and see what you can do (the whole source is of course available in our git repository). And if you're not comfortable in HTML - just send us the text you think should go on there and we'll find someone to do the markup!

« previous page   (Page 1 of 1, totaling 2 entries)   next page »
Frontpage

Calendar

Back November '08 Forward
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Archives

Upcoming conferences

Planned Conferences

Tentative conferences

  • OpenSource Days

Past conferences

  • PGConf.EU 2012
  • Postgres Open 2012
  • PGCon 2012
  • GoOpen
  • Software Passion Summit
  • OpenSource Days
  • Prague PostgreSQL Dev Day
  • FOSDEM 2012
  • PGDay.IT 2011
  • FSCONS 2011
  • Postgres Open 2011
  • PGConf.EU 2011
  • Char(11) 2011
  • EuroPython 2011
  • PGCon 2011
  • NLUUG Spring
  • PG-East 2011
  • OpenSource Days 2011
  • P2D2 2011
  • FOSDEM 2011
  • PGDay.EU 2010
  • PG-West 2010
  • PG-East 2010
  • PGCon 2010
  • OpenSource Days 2010
  • FOSS-Stockholm #1
  • FOSDEM 2010
  • JPUG 2009
  • FSCONS
  • PGDay.EU 2009
  • PGcon.BR 2009
  • JDCon West 2009
  • Highload++ 2009
  • PGCon 2009
  • Prague PG Day 2009
  • FOSDEM 2009
  • FSCONS 2008
  • PGDay.EU 2008
  • Open Source Days 2008
  • PG-West 2008
  • PGCon 2008
  • PG-East 2008
  • FOSDEM 2008

Tags

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Latest comments

Matt Spencer about PostgreSQL vs 64-bit windows
Wed, 06.06.2012 05:23
I agree totally, the 64-bit ve rsion definitely solves the pr oblem if you need more memory. We need to gradually sh [...]
Jim Smithson about PostgreSQL vs 64-bit windows
Tue, 05.06.2012 07:04
Users who are challenged by th e memory taxing qualities of t he 64 bit should go back to us ing 32 bit. It offers sm [...]
Magnus Hagander about PostgreSQL vs 64-bit windows
Thu, 19.04.2012 08:22
You are missing the point - wh ich is exactly that the filesy stem level cache does not ha ve a lower cache hit rat [...]
Marcov about PostgreSQL vs 64-bit windows
Mon, 26.03.2012 19:57
Any VM base caching is limited to the maximal mappable addre ss space(which is about 4G in windows 64-bit, 3GB in 3 [...]
Magnus Hagander about Finding gaps in partitioned sequences
Mon, 06.02.2012 10:18
Hah, thanks for pointing that out. That's what I get for try ing to clean up the formatting when posting it...
mark about Finding gaps in partitioned sequences
Tue, 31.01.2012 19:01
thanks, sorry I should have no ticed that was the seq MINUS t he lag function. p.s. you example may have a typo [...]
Magnus Hagander about Finding gaps in partitioned sequences
Mon, 30.01.2012 17:25
No, there are no user defined functions in this. seq is the column name, then minus the o perator, then lag the bu [...]
mark about Finding gaps in partitioned sequences
Mon, 30.01.2012 17:23
what is seq-lag ? i assume thi s is a user defined func.
Magnus Hagander about www.postgresql.org - brand new, yet old and familiar
Thu, 22.12.2011 17:41
Yeah, unfortunately we are sti ll waiting on David to migrate the content over there.
Dave about www.postgresql.org - brand new, yet old and familiar
Thu, 22.12.2011 16:55
The weekly news page (http://w ww.postgresql.org/community/we eklynews/) seems to be broken. I see only a couple of [...]
tweetbackcheck